There has been much
dis-information posted on the Internet about the Uttarakaula tradition line
that descended from Pagalababa of Ranchi, which has been copied into books and
sites, so it seems necessary to set records straight:
|
Uttarakaula
Lineage
|
Shri Dadaji Gurudev Mahendranath [1911-1991]
became the first European to receive Indian Sannyasi initiation, when he
arrived in India in 1953, from Shri Lokanath Maharaj into the Adi Nath
Sampradaya, who claim descent from Matseyendranath.
|
Pagalababa |
Further travels to Bihar and Bengal led to initiation into
the Uttarakaula Tantrik Tradition by Pagalababa of Ranchi. At a time when
communications were less well developed than in the 21
st century
Dadaji thought that Pagalababa was the last guru of that tradition, and when he
died he thought the lineage would become extinct in India, as would the Adi
Nath line, although the Nath Acara is a vast network of sub sects based on the
teachings of Goraksnath, a pupil of Matseyendranath. Goraksnaths ideas were
designed for the development of monastic disciplines, unlike those of his
teacher.
|
Sri Gurudeva Dadaji Mahendranath |
So Dadaji had made plans for international groups to carry
the lines forward because of the effects of Westernisation on the Indian
population. He did initiate a native Indian into Adi Nath line: now Yogiraj
Gurunath Siddhanath, as well as Westerners, to spread the Nath principles
worldwide. What he did not know because of poor communications in India was
that Thakar Kalachand, who had received initiation in the Uttara line from
Pagal Haranath had not only initiated Pagalababa but also a female guru,
Maheshwari Ma, who in turn, had initiated Kulavadhut of Sikkim, and who is
still alive and well in 2015.
|
Kulavadhut
|
Therefore the native
Indian lineage did not die with Mahendranath, but instead thrives, alongside
the international group that Dadaji began. Any decision on Dadaji's part to
fuse Adi Nath and Uttarakaula traditions was not therefore within the scope of
decision making available to him, and neither of the native lines did become
extinct with his death.
It seems highly likely that there are other branches of the
Uttara tree that Dadaji was unaware of too, as is seen in the two branches
created by Thakar Kalachand in Pagalababa and Maheshwari Ma, that reveal that
in the tradition there is not necessarily a history of having to have an
absolute solitary guru figure.
|
Maheshwari Ma |
first appeared on the noticeboard for the Western branch of the Uttara Kaula tradition
Maheshwari Ma was the Shakti of Byon Shankar Aghori, also of the Uttarakaula lineage, who Crowley met Nepal when mountainclimbing. He told Dadaji to find him when he was reached Asia but he was dead by the time Dadaji reached Pashupatinath Temple, otherwise he would have known of the Maheshwari Ma line of the Uttaras that ran parallel to Pagalababas.
ReplyDeleteThanks John, what is the source of the Crowley information?
DeleteDadaji told it to Kristen Godfrey [Lalitanath]. I think she mentions it Nava Natha on her Nath Society website.
Deletehttp://livingessence.info/livingessencecentre/index.php... For Kula Avadhut biography
ReplyDeleteAdding to the lineage Ma Shoroshi Prajna, Kulavadhut's successor. https://www.facebook.com/kulavadhuta.satpurananda/posts/10157876050894779
ReplyDelete